
Genome editing for livestock farming
More than 800 animal scientists met recently at the annual meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss challenges and solutions relating to the future of livestock breeding and farming. At the meeting, on thing became apparent: Genome editing is gaining importance in this sector, too.
Wednesday, September 15, 2021
The American animal scientist Jack H. Britt, is convinced that improving animal genetics and increasing feeding efficiency can have a significant impact on climate change. Dairy cattle genetics are evolving, says Britt. And, he adds, genomics are the key to selecting young animals for breeding. Britt is quick to point out that “We’re working on genome editing – not genetic engineering.” In his view, this breeding method is an important factor in securing the food supply for the human population. The cow of the future will be, he says, healthier, more fertile and less of a burden to the environment.
Important role of epigenetics
Britt also spoke about epigenetics, a field that he views as highly significant and deserving of a lot more attention in the future. This new discipline within genetics looks at changes in gene expression that result from changes in enzyme access to DNA strands rather than changes to the DNA sequence itself. Britt showed epigenetic effects resulting from heat stress among cows and their offspring. For example, studies show that the female offspring of heat-stressed cows produce less milk than daughters of cows that were not subjected to heat stress. This effect has even been documented in the third generation of female offspring. “We’re only beginning to understand these epigenetic effects,” says Britt. He surmises that epigenetics have a greater influence on animal characteristics than the genes themselves.
Britt also mentions the fodder plants, stating that feeding genome-edited plants also resulted in significant increases in yield. In one example, scientists were able to make a plant absorb considerably more sunlight, and thus increase plant yield by 20 percent by simply turning off a gene.
Related articles

EU authorises glyphosate for another 10 years
The EU Commission has decided to endorse the assessment of the European Food Safety Authority, which found no critical problem areas regarding the effects of glyphosate on the environment and human and animal health. The EU Commission's science-based decision to extend the authorisation for a further 10 years is also a rejection of the scare campaigns by Greenpeace and Co.

Asian hornet threatens native honey bee
More and more invasive pests are spreading in Switzerland. The most recent example is the Asian hornet, which poses a major threat to the native honey bee. But other invasive species also threaten agriculture and biodiversity. Control measures are many and varied. But pesticides (plant protection products and biocides) remain an important tool in the fight against the pests.

Greenpeace and the matter of facts
Greenpeace has been fighting bitterly against green genetic engineering for decades. SWR Wissen investigated why the environmental campaign organisation has become so entrenched in the issue and detached itself from scientific evidence. In the case of "Golden Rice", the consequences are particularly glaring. But alarmism also threatens to block important innovations in new breeding methods.

Unfounded Fears of Subtle Poisoning
In a compelling interview with Berliner Tagesspiegel, Andreas Hensel, a renowned Ger-man veterinary, and microbiologist, underscores the often-misunderstood perceptions regarding pesticide-related risks.